Skip to main content

Probation playbook

The complete probation success system

Download Probation pack overview
Ellipse
People interacting through laptop and tablet screens

FAQs

How does the six-month unfair dismissal qualifying period affect employers' probationary contracts?

Employees hired from July 2026 will hit the six-month mark on or after 1 January 2027, meaning current six-month probationary periods may no longer provide a “buffer” for dismissal. Employers should consider shifting to a three-month standard probation with a one-month extension option to ensure final decisions are made well before the six-month protection threshold.

What is the financial impact of the removal of the statutory cap on unfair dismissal awards?

From 1 January 2027, the law removes the cap on compensation for unfair dismissal, meaning tribunals can now order payouts based on an individual’s total actual losses, including lost salary, bonuses, share schemes, and pension contributions, with no upper limit.

For high earners, this is a massive change as they are no longer restricted by a fixed worst-case scenario figure, which used to make calculating potential payouts fairly straightforward. Because of this, employers lose the ability to easily price in the risk of a dismissal and moving forward, high-stakes exits will be much more costly and complex to negotiate, making it essential to have a more robust, documented evidence for every dismissal to avoid the threat of a massive, uncapped tribunal award.

How should employers train line managers to handle new hires under the new unfair dismissal rules?

To keep the probation process fair and legally sound, employers must equip managers to understand their responsibilities within a shorter probation period window, encouraging them support employees through regular check-ins. Regular, informal dialogue helps managers spot performance gaps earlier. Without these touchpoints, it’s easy opportunities to make practical adjustments that help any new hire succeed.

This is especially relevant when managers are less experienced in supporting different ways of working, such as when someone has a specific disability or a neurodivergent profile. Every team member deserves equal support, but managers often lack the confidence to ask about individual needs. Reasonable adjustments can resolve a gap before it becomes a formal issue, which improves the overall employee experience. Coaching managers to have the right conversations and the right time reduces risk.

AI-assisted grievances: more words, more work?

| Employment Law | No Comments
AI is making it easier than ever for employees to turn a workplace concern into a lengthy, legalistic grievance. Here's how to approach AI-assisted grievances to stop them making an…

Planning a redundancy exercise? Set yourself up for success

| Redundancy | No Comments
The most robust and defensible redundancy processes start long before employees are placed at risk. Here's what great planning looks like.

Redundancy risk is increasing. Here’s why.

| Redundancy | No Comments
Redundancy exercises are likely to become more heavily scrutinised, more demanding and, if employers get them wrong, potentially much more expensive. Here's what you need to know.